lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:06:58 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	shigeonx@...il.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: XTP for 2.6.25

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, David Miller wrote:

> From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:05:51 +0300 (EEST)
> 
> > On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > > From: "Shigeo N" <shigeonx@...il.com>
> > > Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:51:49 +0900
> > > 
> > > > One host(sender) is 2.6.25, but the other(receiver) is 2.6.18.
> > > > I will evaluate again after I upgrade it to 2.6.25.
> > > 
> > > The bug fix isn't in 2.6.25 either.
> > 
> > Sure it is, or git is lying:
> > 
> > $ git-describe dd9e0dda66ba38a2ddd1405ac279894260dc5c36
> > v2.6.25-rc8-1190-gdd9e0dd
> 
> I just submitted the TCP reorder patch for 2.6.25-stable, it applied
> on top of a tree for which I did:
> 
> 	git checkout -b linux25 v2.6.25
> 
> so something is up :-)

Of course I was wrong :-), misintepreted git-describe's result as it 
cannot prove what I was trying to make it to prove (basically it was
reporting just the latest net-2.6 -> net-2.6.26 merge of yours, while 
that doesn't tell anything about entry of a commit to Linus' tree).

...Sorry about the noise.

-- 
 i.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ