[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080424.213110.202702419.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Cc: ellre923@...il.com, wangchen@...fujitsu.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RAW6: Do not allow set IPV6_CHECKSUM for ICMPv6 socket
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:19:53 +0900 (JST)
> In article <20080424.034845.137470754.davem@...emloft.net> (at Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:48:45 -0700 (PDT)), David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> says:
>
> > From: "chen wang" <ellre923@...il.com>
> > Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:42:14 +0800
> >
> > > 2008/4/20, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>:
> > > > RFC3542 tells that IPV6_CHECKSUM socket option in the IPPROTO_IPV6
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > Where in RFC3542 says that "only IPPROTO_IPV6 level" is not allowed to be
> > > set
> > > IPV6_CHECKSUM option on ICMPv6 socket?
> >
> > Yoshifuji-san, please address this question.
> >
> > I haven't applied this patch, and I won't until this is resolved
> > and discussed.
>
> RFC3542 discusses about IPPROTO_IPV6 level IPV6_CHECKSUM socket option only.
> IPPROTO_RAW level IPV6_CHECKSUM socket option is undocumented Linux
> extension. So, we are free to choose allowing setting that option on
> ICMPv6 socket as we have been doing.
Thank you for this clarification.
I've applied this patch and I'll queue it up for -stable as well.
Thanks again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists