[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18b669d80804250151h516788cdqc7931a7ab5a195de@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:51:49 +0900
From: "Shigeo N" <shigeonx@...il.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: XTP for 2.6.25
One host(sender) is 2.6.25, but the other(receiver) is 2.6.18.
I will evaluate again after I upgrade it to 2.6.25.
Thanks
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Shigeo N wrote:
>
> > case2) random delay
> >
> > In this case, add a fixed amount of delay + 10% random delay by
> > command, "tc change dev eth0 root netem delay 100ms 10ms 25%".
> >
> > Here is the result.
> >
> > fixed delay UDP/TCP/XTP throghput
> > ---------------------------------------
> > 10ms 88/80/92 Mbps
> > 30ms 88/51/91 Mbps
> > 50ms 88/41/89 Mbps
> > 70ms 88/28/80 Mbps
> > 100ms 88/19/66 Mbps
> >
> > TCP's perfomance looks very poor when delay is long and variable.
>
> Where these results with 2.6.25 as well? ...John Heffner just couple of
> days ago fixed reordering related problem in TCP (in case that netem
> parametrization causes reordering), the fix is not even in 2.6.24.y, I
> think...
>
> --
> i.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists