[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804281826260.1888@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:48:12 +0300 (EEST)
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TCP slowdown in 2.6.25?
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 17:42 +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 14:12 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > After upgrading from 2.6.23 to 2.6.25 I am seeing a big slow down on
> > > > our old www server. Stracing shows lots of EAGAIN but i not sure
> > > > these are relevant. I got no idea where to start looking so
> > > > I would appreciate some pointers. Perhaps this is a know issue?
> > > >
> > > > CPU is a PowerPC, mpc8321, network driver ucc_geth
> > >
> > > Some info:
> > > Even ftp transfers takes forever, but only in one direction: from the
> > > node with kernel 2.6.25 to some other host. Strace show me that
> > > write(2) hangs for long periods before succeeding to transmit
> > > the data.
> > To some specific or "any" other host? How long is "long"?
>
> Any host. A 1304632 bytes file takes about 110 seconds to transfer
> (12 Kbytes/sec)
>
> A quick capture with wireshark indicates that some sent packages from
> the node never reaches the host on the network.
Thanks, this is the important bit of info, TCP flow control limit seems
just a consequence of that... ...Now we'll just have to figure out what is
causing those losses.
Is there some middlebox on the route to that host?
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists