[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080501120850.GH14219@solarflare.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 13:08:51 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Kieran Mansley <kmansley@...arflare.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Disable forwarding of LRO skbs
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 12:18:08PM +0100, Kieran Mansley wrote:
> >
> > If I remember rightly it also gets upset when it comes to split the
> > packet because the frag_list is already in use; it expects this not to
> > be the case for GSO but it's valid for an LRO packet to do this I think.
> > I don't think there's anything fundamentally difficult here, it's just
> > that the code has never been written to cope.
>
> Oh so LRO packets still preserve the original packet boundaries?
> That's even easier. We could just make the GSO output code detect
> the presence of frag_list and fragment based on that.
Depending on the driver, the packets may be received into skbs which are
then attached to frag_list, or into page buffers which go in the frags
array. If most packets can be merged by LRO, deferring skb allocation
and using the frags array is a performance win.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists