[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1209892489.6210.56.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 11:14:49 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, mb@...sch.de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mac80211 truesize bugs
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 10:47 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 11:16 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 04:22:20AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, wireless always needs at least 24 bytes, but more likely 34
> > > (encryption+QoS). However, I just increased LL_MAX_HEADER to 54 and that
> > > doesn't seem to have helped.
> >
> > How did you test it?
>
> I stuck a WARN_ON((nhead || ntail) && skb->sk) into pskb_expand_head
> (which never triggered except from mac80211). And mac80211 has code that
> calculates the required header length and only calls pskb_expand_head()
> from that place when it needs more header space (or the skb is cloned. I
> should repeat this test)
I just re-did the test, and I definitely need 29 more bytes on, for
example, the IPv6 autodiscovery packets and ICMP packets generated with
ping(8). Some of them even need additional tailroom.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists