netdev - Re: [PATCH v2.6.26] ucc_geth: Fix arguments to dma map/unmap functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <DDDA7132-5D28-4C57-99A8-048A5C9A5291@freescale.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 May 2008 16:21:46 -0500
From:	Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.6.26] ucc_geth: Fix arguments to dma map/unmap functions


On May 6, 2008, at 11:18, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Andy Fleming wrote:
>> We were passing NULL as the device.  When we actually start  
>> supporting
>> more interesting memory configurations, this will break things, so
>> we proactively are fixing the bug.
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ucc_geth.c |    9 +++++----
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> ACK but failed to apply


Hmm...I think I got my patches sent out in the wrong order.  I think  
if you try this patch again, it will apply, now that you've applied  
the ucc_geth sparse patch.  I just rebased my tree against netdev/ 
upstream, and it applies without any problems.  Sorry, next time I'll  
make sure to number my patches when there's a dependency.

Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html