[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805061618460.25162@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 16:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
cc: Matthew Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
mtk.manpages@...il.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/18] flag parameters: epoll_create
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 6 May 2008, Matthew Helsley wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 23:42 -0400, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > > > This patch adds the new epoll_create2 syscall. It extends the old epoll_create
> > > > syscall by one parameter which is meant to hold a flag value. In this
> > > > patch the only flag support is EPOLL_CLOEXEC which causes the close-on-exec
> > > > flag for the returned file descriptor to be set.
> > >
> > > Davide, Ulrich,
> > >
> > > A minor question: Why did you choose to pass the seemingly useless
> > > "size" parameter into the new epoll_create2 system call? I did some
> > > googling for previous threads with this series and couldn't find a
> > > discussion on why you chose to keep it.
> >
> > The very first implementations were using an hash, and that was a size
> > hint.
>
> So, why not simply remove this argument in the new API, since it is now useless?
I'm more than OK with that.
- Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists