netdev - Re: [PATCH 02/18] flag parameters: socket and socketpair

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080505194221.4349418b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 5 May 2008 19:42:21 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davidel@...ilserver.org, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] flag parameters: socket and socketpair

On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:33:46 -0700 Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > afaict we only ever remap one or two flags.
> 
> So far.  I have plans for at least one more flag: the one we'll
> hopefully have sometime soon to request non-sequential file descriptors.
>  There is no reason why there shouldn't be even more in future.

oh.  More overhead.

Sorry to sound slow, but what do we gain from all this?  Your covering
description was heavy in references to some earlier discussion to which I
obviously paid little attention and now I'm lost.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html