[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080508.155841.88051498.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 15:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: roland@...hat.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, drepper@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davidel@...ilserver.org, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...sign.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] flag parameters: paccept
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 15:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
> It's now spelled:
>
> set_restore_sigmask();
>
> For the other syscalls that depend on this (e.g. sys_ppoll),
> we just put the whole definition in #ifdef HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK.
>
> The few machines that don't have RESTORE_SIGMASK support of some flavor,
> also have not assigned numbers to the syscalls that need it.
I notice that this macro also sets the sigpending bit, although
some paths that end up calling set_restore_sigmask() already
do that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists