[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <482849C9.30905@damtek.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 09:44:41 -0400
From: "Damon L. Chesser" <damon@...tek.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
CC: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Fix FRTO+NewReno problem (Was: Re: This has a work around)
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2008, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
>
>
>> I ran the first patch and received this error:
>>
>> root@...-main:/usr/src/linux-2.6.24.1# patch -p1 < ../1st_frto_patch.diff
>> patching file net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>> patch: **** malformed patch at line 17: @@ -1685,6 +1683,10 @@ static inline
>> void tcp_reset_reno_sack(struct tcp_sock *tp)
>>
>> root@...-main:/usr/src/linux-2.6.24.1#
>>
>> below is the text of the patch.diff I have:
>>
>
> I suppose there was some space-vs-tab or additional-line-break added
> issue while you saved it. Please try to save from the attached files
> instead, it should keep the original formatting, they work as is with
> patch -p1 (no need to cut anything). I tried them into 2.6.24.1 and both
> of those should apply, though with some fuzz.
>
> --
> i.
Ilpo,
I applied the patches in order, no errors on that. I compiled a stock
2.4.24-1 kernel with the patches, I saw no errors there.
booted into new kernel, printed with tcp_frto=0. set tcp_frto =2,
restarted the network (is this required, or is this a dynamic setting?),
printed from OO document. No joy. tcpdump log attached (almost 15 min.
worth of data)
If you want, I can re-compile and double check for any compilation
errors, however, if there were any, it was not sever enough to stop the
compilation.
--
Damon L. Chesser
damon@...tek.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser
View attachment "frtoprob4.txt" of type "text/plain" (35006 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists