netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10600] New: e1000 updates rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4827E2FE.1040109@acm.org>
Date:	Mon, 12 May 2008 01:26:06 -0500
From:	Ben Liblit <liblit@....org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, mchan@...adcom.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, john.ronciak@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10600] New: e1000 updates rx_bytes infrequently

David Miller wrote:
> You're missing a zero in that string, it's "e1000e" not "e100e", and
> did you make sure to enable CONFIG_E1000E in your kernel config?

Sorry, that was a typo in my comment but not in my actual experiments. 
I used "e1000e", not "e100e".  CONFIG_E1000E is enabled, and "lsmod" 
confirmed that the e1000e module was definitely loaded into the kernel. 
  "The kernel", for the record, is the current Fedora 8 kernel, 
2.6.24.5-85.fc8.

I realize that pristine, self-built kernels are preferred for bug 
reporting.  I am currently building my own 2.6.25.3 so that I can affirm 
or refute Jesse Brandeburg's claim (comment #12) that this bug is fixed 
in 2.6.25-rc1 and later.  I'll report my findings when available, 
assuming I still remember how to install my own kernels.  (Yes, yes, 
I've gotten soft and lazy.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html