[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080514.182637.211478588.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 18:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...tta.com
Cc: greg@...ah.com, fubar@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs: remove error messages for -EEXIST case
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 18:16:03 -0700
> It is possible that the entry in sysfs already exists, one case of this is
> when a network device is renamed to bonding_masters. Anyway, in this case
> the proper error path is for device_rename to return an error code, not to
> generate bogus backtrace and errors.
>
> Also, to avoid possible races, the create link should be done before the
> remove link. This makes a device rename atomic operation like other renames.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
I definitely agree with this change.
We have several cases where device names are user configurable,
yet the devices live in a directory which also has subdirectories
created by other subsystems.
It's pointless to require the top-level guy to look for any
purge out any subdirectory cases, that's none of it's business.
I realize the backtrace is useful for finding bugs, but in this
case it's definitely not appropriate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists