netdev - Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080516054959.GA3918@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Fri, 16 May 2008 05:49:59 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Kingsley Foreman <kingsley@...ernode.com.au>
Cc:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NET_SCHED cbq dropping too many packets on a bonding interface

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 06:57:23AM +0930, Kingsley Foreman wrote:
...
> running
>
> tc qdisc add dev bond0 root pfifo limit 1000
>
> or
>
> tc qdisc add dev bond0 root handle 1: cbq bandwidth 2000Mbit avpkt 1000 
> cell 0
> tc qdisc add dev bond0 parent 1: pfifo limit 1000
>
>
> doesn't appear to be dropping packets. 
>

Great! So it looks like there is no error here unless there are needed
significantly bigger queues to stop this dropping compared to 2.6.22.
You could try to lower this limit now to something like 10 to find when
drops start to appear. Why 2.6.22 doesn't need this at all is a mistery
anyway (old scheduler?), and it would really need some work (like git
bisection) to find the reason for more than 5 or 10 packet difference.

Thanks,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html