netdev - Re: [IPV6] ADDRCONF: Defer dad for global address until dad for linklocal is completed.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48345C4C.6020106@miraclelinux.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 May 2008 02:30:52 +0900
From:	Toyo Abe <tabe@...aclelinux.com>
To:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 
	<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [IPV6] ADDRCONF: Defer dad for global address until dad for linklocal
 is completed.

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <4832C3CC.5070609@...aclelinux.com> (at Tue, 20 May 2008 21:27:56 +0900), Toyo Abe <tabe@...aclelinux.com> says:
> 
>> I was also thinking so. And I tried it at first.
>> But then, many other test scenarios in TAHI test suite went to FAIL. It
>> was because
>> the tester node send RA with prefix option to the host right after it
>> receives DAD NS
>> from the host, which is obviously in autoconfiguration process for
>> linklocal address.
> 
> If so, we should complain about the spec / tests.
>
Maybe so.
Well, did you observe the same problem?


>> Since current addrconf code actually accepts RA including prefix option 
>> while DAD for
>> linklocal address is processing, changes of the behaviour looks like a 
>> degradation for me.
>> Hence, I chose to accept RA at that moment and defer sending DAD NS for 
>> global addresses.
> 
> Well I don't think so.
> We should choose simpler way - avoid introducing new "unique" state so far.
> 
> If you really think is worth accepting RA during DAD for link-local
> address, we should cancel all of on-going DADs for global address(es)
> if the RA for link-local address has failed, intead of deferring DAD
> for global address(es).
>
You're right. I agree with you that it'd be better than mine.

Thank you,
-toyo


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html