[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48353CB9.5080609@aitel.hist.no>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 11:28:25 +0200
From: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@...el.hist.no>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Chris Peterson <cpeterso@...terso.com>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, tpm@...horst.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last
few uses of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Herbert Xu wrote:
>
>>
>> You can continue to feed data into the pool even if it fails the
>> test. You just keep the entropy value same as before.
>>
>
> You could do that, but what advantage would it have? I don't think it's
> worth running the FIPS test, or rather requiring the user land daemon
> and leaving behind most of the userbase just for this.
>
Security through obfuscation?
Someone trying to predict the RNG can do so in theory, but if
they have to keep track of network timings, disk activity, and 5 other
things, then
chances are that they fail ofen enough even if the attack is possible
"in theory".
Helge Hafting
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists