[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080523053209.GD8612@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 22:32:09 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, michaelc@...wisc.edu,
Anil Veerabhadrappa <anilgv@...adcom.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
open-iscsi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] bnx2: Add support for CNIC driver.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:52:48PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > So if a second CNIC driver attempts to register, it gets -EBUSY or
> > something, right?
>
> There is only one CNIC driver and it will only register once per
> BNX2 netdevice.
I would nevertheless recommend keeping an error check...
> > > You are right. We should just unconditionally set up the IRQ
> > > information without checking for c_ops. The data
> > structures we set up
> > > below are owned by us.
> >
> > OK. Hmmm.... You cannot even get away with sarcasm these days! ;-)
>
> Hmm, not sure what's the sarcasm. The code here is trying to set up
> the IRQ information so that CNIC driver can see it. Even if the CNIC
> driver is deregistering or was never registered, it doesn't hurt to
> set up that information.
The sarcasm was that I really didn't expect you to simply be able to
remove the check. ;-)
> Anyway, I'll add some comments to the code to explain this better when
> I respin.
>
> > Very good. Could you please add a comment to that effect? Otherwise
> > people search for what data structure is being freed up.
> >
>
> Will do. Thanks.
Sounds good!
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists