netdev - RE: [VLAN]: Use bitmask of feature flags instead of seperate feature bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <D5C1322C3E673F459512FB59E0DDC329052350BA@orsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 May 2008 10:38:43 -0700
From:	"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	<kaber@...sh.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [VLAN]: Use bitmask of feature flags instead of seperate feature bits

> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 09:02:39AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > > 
> > >     [VLAN]: Use bitmask of feature flags instead of 
> seperate feature 
> > > bits
> > >     
> > >     Herbert Xu points out that the use of seperate 
> feature bits for features
> > >     to be propagated to VLAN devices is going to get 
> messy real soon.
> > >     Replace the VLAN feature bits by a bitmask of feature 
> flags to be
> > >     propagated and restore the old GSO_SHIFT/MASK values.
> > >     
> > >     Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
> > 
> > Looks great Patrick, thanks!
> > 
> > Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> 
> Applied and pushed out to net-2.6, thanks everyone!

Just to close the loop, also tested on ixgbe without issue.

Cheers,
-PJ Waskiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html