[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b25c3fa70805262320h7edb4246wd017261fe7187b88@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 23:20:58 -0700
From: "Joonwoo Park" <joonwpark81@...il.com>
To: "Patrick McHardy" <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] [VLAN]: Unclassified vlan packet
2008/5/26 Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>:
> Joonwoo Park wrote:
>>
>> To be polite to the PACKET,
>> Don't kill the unclassified & hardware accelerated vlan packets if netdev
>> is in promiscuous, set packet type with PACKET_OTHERHOST. Put the vlan tag
>> into skb->cb for all hardware accelerated vlan packets.
>
> Conceptually I think this patch goes in the right direction,
> one question remaining is when to invalidate the VLAN tag again.
>
> The only solution I could come up with is invalidating it in
> netif_receive_skb() when the receiving device is not a VLAN
> device and additionally invalidating it in all callers of
> dev_queue_xmit except VLAN itself, but I would really prefer
> something less error prone without touching netif_receive_skb().
>
> BTW, I already have a patch queued to move the VLAN tag from
> skb->cb to a seperate skb member to fix the the conflict with
> qdiscs (this should also allow to use vlan accel through virtual
> network devices later on). So please don't resend, I'll integrate
> the patch on top of this change once we find a good spot for
> invalidation.
>
Thanks Patrick for reviewing.
I'll be looking forward to seeing it on the list.
Thanks,
Joonwoo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists