[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <483F46E5.9030707@sun.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:14:29 -0700
From: Matheos Worku <Matheos.Worku@....COM>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jesper@...gh.cc, yhlu.kernel@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NIU - Sun Neptune 10g - Transmit timed out reset (2.6.24)
David Miller wrote:
>From: Matheos Worku <Matheos.Worku@....COM>
>Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 18:18:57 -0700
>
>
>
>>Considering that fixing the HW would take considerable time, I was
>>wondering if the scheme we use in the nxge driver could be considered as
>>a workaround. Since the niu driver is already doing skb_orphan as a work
>>around, what if already transmitted TX buffers are reclaimed
>>periodically, within dev->hard_start_xmit() ? Then TX_DESC_MARK would
>>be set if/when available TX descriptor count falls below some watermark.
>>Disable device TX queue about the time TX_DESC_MARK is set and enable
>>it within TX interrupt.
>>
>>
>
>Since my hack patch didn't fix his problem at all, are you suggesting
>that we end up not fielding TX mark interrupts even though mark is set
>in all the TX descriptors and this is what hangs the chip?
>
>I find that very unlikely, especially because with my test patch every
>single TX descriptor will have the mark bit set and therefore we'd
>have to not receive all of those TX mark interrupts in order for the
>TX unit to hang like that.
>
>Something else must be going wrong.
>
>
Dave,
Actually what I am suggesting was a workaround for the lack of "TX Ring
Empty" interrupt by not relying on the TX interrupt at all. As for the
TX hang, I will try to reproduce the problem and look at the registers
for the clue.
Regards
Matheos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists