netdev - Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -rc4] Smack: Respect 'unlabeled' netlabel mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <538684.41302.qm@web36603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 May 2008 16:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
Cc:	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX -rc4] Smack: Respect 'unlabeled' netlabel mode


--- "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> In case of Smack 'unlabeled' netlabel option, Smack passes a _zero_
> initialized 'secattr' to label a packet/sock. This causes an 
> [unfound domain label error]/-ENOENT by netlbl_sock_setattr().
> Above Netlabel failure leads to Smack socket hooks failure causing 
> an always-on socket() -EPERM error.
> 
> Such packets should have a netlabel domain agreed with netlabel to 
> represent unlabeled packets. Fortunately Smack net ambient label 
> packets are agreed with netlabel to be treated as unlabeled packets. 
> 
> Treat all packets coming out from a 'unlabeled' Smack system as
> coming from the smack net ambient label.

To date the behavior of a Smack system running with nltype
unlabeled has been carefully undefined. The way you're defining
it will result in a system in which only processes running with
the ambient label will be able to use sockets, unless I'm reading
the code incorrectly. This seems like "correct" behavior, but
I don't think it is what those who've tried it would expect.


Casey Schaufler
casey@...aufler-ca.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html