[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080531201130.0244dc29@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 20:11:30 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: PATCH] net: b44.c fix sleeping-with-spinlock-helt during resume
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: b44.c fix sleeping-with-spinlock-helt during resume
CC: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
The b44.c driver calls b44_chip_reset() from the resume path,
with the device spinlock held.
Unfortunately, b44_chip_reset() calls ssb_pcicore_dev_irqvecs_enable()
which is a sleeping function (and calls might_sleep), if and only if
the device hasn't been enabled yet.
Not having this hardware, the safest solution seems to be to enable
the irqvec before taking the spinlock...
http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=ssb_pcicore_dev_irqvecs_enable
Reported-by: www.kerneloops.org
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven
---
drivers/net/b44.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/b44.c b/drivers/net/b44.c
index 59dce6a..6028129 100644
--- a/drivers/net/b44.c
+++ b/drivers/net/b44.c
@@ -1278,6 +1278,7 @@ static void b44_chip_reset(struct b44 *bp, int reset_kind)
bw32(bp, B44_DMARX_CTRL, 0);
bp->rx_prod = bp->rx_cons = 0;
} else
+ /* this function sleeps! */
ssb_pcicore_dev_irqvecs_enable(&sdev->bus->pcicore, sdev);
ssb_device_enable(bp->sdev, 0);
@@ -1374,7 +1375,7 @@ static int b44_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev, void *p)
}
/* Called at device open time to get the chip ready for
- * packet processing. Invoked with bp->lock held.
+ * packet processing. Sometimes invoked with bp->lock held.
*/
static void __b44_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *);
static void b44_init_hw(struct b44 *bp, int reset_kind)
@@ -2288,6 +2289,13 @@ static int b44_resume(struct ssb_device *sdev)
return rc;
}
+ /*
+ * If the device isn't enabled yet, we need to do so before taking
+ * the spinlock, since the enablinging function sleeps.
+ */
+ if (!ssb_device_is_enabled(bp->sdev))
+ ssb_pcicore_dev_irqvecs_enable(&sdev->bus->pcicore, sdev);
+
spin_lock_irq(&bp->lock);
b44_init_rings(bp);
--
1.5.5.1
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists