[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca0148c30805312259v4d6a9344le94050ea9295eed8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 08:59:55 +0300
From: "Matti Linnanvuori" <mattilinn@...il.com>
To: "Krzysztof Halasa" <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.2.26] wan: new driver retina
2008/5/30 Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>:
> "Matti Linnanvuori" <mattilinn@...il.com> writes:
>>>> +static int fepci_char_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>>>> +{
>>>> + unsigned int minor = MINOR(inode->i_rdev);
>>>> + if (unlikely(minor >= find_cnt || card_privates[minor].pci_dev == NULL))
>>>> + return -ENXIO;
>>>> + filp->f_op = &fepci_char_fops;
>>>> + if (unlikely(!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)))
>>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>>
>>> That won't work race-free, use owner field.
>>
>> You mean the f_op assignment? I have removed that.
>
> Actually I meant try_module_get() from within the driver, for example
> your module may get unloaded while in this function, before this
> try_module_get(), and that would be fatal.
I don't think the module can finish getting unloaded while in that
function because the module cleanup function unregisters the
character device.
> Yes, I thought stream mode = character device but now I see it's
> another flavour of network device(?), which is never up and exists
> only for the ability to receive netdev ioctls (though it also uses
> char dev ioctls).
>
> Did I get this right?
Yeah.
> Why not simply use a character device, with normal read, write etc?
It would make more sense to use a character device. Read and write
system calls consume more CPU time, though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists