[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <484419EE.5040503@garzik.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:03:58 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phylib: Don't allow core of phylib to build as a module
Kumar Gala wrote:
> The core portions of the phylib aren't capable of being used as
> a module. This isn't really any different than something like i2c
> in that the bus driver and core need to be built into the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
> ---
>
> Jeff, please consider this for 2.6.26 as w/o it we get build issues
> if phylib is config'd as a module on ppc.
>
> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> index 6eb2d31..ab04cc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> #
>
> menuconfig PHYLIB
> - tristate "PHY Device support and infrastructure"
> + bool "PHY Device support and infrastructure"
> depends on !S390
> depends on NET_ETHERNET
What are the issues?
The core _should_ be able to be built as a module.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists