[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0806021706130.17236-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:09:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel@...edrich.de>
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@...dia.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/4] Fix forcedeth hibernate/wake-on-lan
problems
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> > > (BTW I first thought the 'immediate reboot because of usb wake' effect is
> > > caused by the optical mouse generating a wake event, but it rather
> > > seems to be a problem with a flaky secondary usb host controller,
> > > which sees a connected device where nothing is attached)
> >
> > Can you provide debugging information (i.e., CONFIG_USB_DEBUG) with the
> > details on this bogus wakeup?
>
> Sure.
> Here is the complete log of one boot and two s2disk_platform cycles
> captured using the serial console (in the first s2disk I forgot to
> remove the 'turn off /sys/bus/usb/device/usb?/power/wakeup' part).
>
> Interestingly even with power/wakeup disabled for usb1 and usb2,
> which I assume to be the usb root ports, I could wake up the system
> by pressing a key on my keyboard (which didn't work before turning
> on CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND).
>
> On the second suspend the system rebooted immediately as expected
> (I power/wakeup for usb1 and usb2 back on and disabled the part in
> the script).
>
> I think this might be some general usb hw flakiness, since it seems
> to detect (and has so for a long time) a non-existing device:
>
> lsusb output:
> Bus 002 Device 003: ID 045e:00db Microsoft Corp. Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 V1.0
> Bus 002 Device 002: ID 045e:0040 Microsoft Corp. Wheel Mouse Optical
> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
>
> bogus device?:
> [14316046.469949] usb 2-4: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 12
> [14316046.679951] usb 2-4: device descriptor read/64, error -62
> [14316046.986619] usb 2-4: device descriptor read/64, error -62
> [14316047.263284] usb 2-4: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 13
> [14316047.476614] usb 2-4: device descriptor read/64, error -62
> [14316047.786618] usb 2-4: device descriptor read/64, error -62
> [14316048.063282] usb 2-4: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 14
> [14316048.499945] usb 2-4: device not accepting address 14, error -62
> [14316048.669950] usb 2-4: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 15
> [14316049.106612] usb 2-4: device not accepting address 15, error -62
> [14316049.112960] hub 2-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 4
It's possible. Maybe there's a builtin broken USB device, or maybe the
D+ pin on port 4 is wired to a positive voltage source.
The log didn't reveal anything. Perhaps you can learn more by looking
at the "registers" file for that OHCI controller in debugfs.
Also, you should run "lspci -vv" as root to see what wakeup signals the
USB controllers are issuing.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists