[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <484569CB.9090104@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:56:59 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, adrian.bunk@...ial.fi,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Make board force selection of PHYLIB
Kumar Gala wrote:
> I see. However, I don't like the idea I have to build in the PHYLIB
> if I don't need it at all.
Understood, but in practice I don't think the 10K or so matters that
much on a typical 85xx board, and if the user really needs to trim
things down, they always have the option of manually ripping the phy
stuff out.
> It seems like the type of breakage you are talking about exists today
> all over the place.
It exists in a few places, but it's not that common, and often it's
obvious what went wrong when the module won't load because some kernel
hook didn't get built. It's not a huge deal, but I'd rather avoid
introducing another instance.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists