[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080603102144.571df55b@extreme>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:21:44 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] IPV6: remove addresses and routes when carrier is
lost
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 01:17:17 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org> wrote:
> In article <20080602165347.5662f602@...reme> (at Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:53:47 -0700), Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> says:
>
> > Similar to previous change for IPV4. Allow configuration option to remove
> > addresses from FIB when carrier is lost.
> >
> > This patch also makes IPV6 ignore changes to carrier state when device
> > is admin down state. This prevents address configuration from starting
> > up on a buggy device driver that signals carrier changes when offline.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
>
> Well, we need to be careful here.
> IMHO we should not remove addresses (especially link-local address
> based on MAC, or manually assigned addresses, maybe).
> We might want to do Optimistic DAD here.
>
> --yoshfuji
The patch just makes carrier_off respond the same as doing 'ip link set dev eth0 down'
(or ifconfig eth0 down). A router needs to be able to re-route when link fails.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists