[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080603.103716.193719039.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mokuno@...sony.co.jp
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: : Emit event stream compat iw_point objects correctly.
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Masakazu Mokuno <mokuno@...sony.co.jp>
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:16:29 +0900
>
> > The source address does not have to be adjusted. I think it should be
> > ((char *) iwe) + IW_EV_LCP_LEN,
> > or just
> > &iwe->u
> > I think it is more readable what we want to do here.
> >
> >
> > > + event_len - lcp_len);
> >
> > The length of the real payload does not need to take account of the
> > destination offset change. So we can keep the original code like:
> >
> > org_event_len - IW_EV_LCP_LEN);
>
> As long as IW_EV_LCP_LEN and IW_EV_COMPAT_LCP_LEN are different, I am
> pretty sure we need to make these adjustments.
>
> There are so many differences in how struct vs. sub-struct alignment will
> occur in these cases, that we need to be very careful.
>
> I'll try to look more closely at this and do some testing of my own on
> a compat platform.
I know understand what you were trying to say, indeed the source
address does not and should not need to be adjusted, it is in
non-compat format afterall.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists