netdev - Re: non-root, non-real network manipulation for netconf testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:13:21 +0200
From:	martin f krafft <madduck@...duck.net>
To:	netdev discussion list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	netconf developers list <netconf-devel@...ts.alioth.debian.org>
Subject: Re: non-root, non-real network manipulation for netconf testing

also sprach Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> [2008.06.03.1247 +0200]:
> I don't believe that's the case for UML.

You're right. I spent some time with UML yesterday and got it to the
point where it can run an command in a UML and report back the
status code without requiring any setup or root rights. If you're
interested:

  http://git.debian.org/?p=netconf/netconf.git;a=tree;f=uml;hb=umltest

Now I need to figure out how to set up uml_switch as a user such
that I can have two or three interfaces within the UML on the same
network segment.

Right now, my problem is that if eth0-2 have 1.2.3.1-3 assigned to
them, pinging 1.2.3.2 from 1.2.3.1 will make Linux route the packets
via loopback. I need to figure out how to make them be put on the
wire (which is uml_switch in this case).

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/

"whale feces or working at microsoft? i would probably be the whale
 feces researcher. salt air and whale flatulence; what
 could go wrong?"
             -- michael moyer, executive editor of _popular science_

spamtraps: madduck.bogus@...duck.net

Download attachment "digital_signature_gpg.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)