[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080604091321.GB20153@lapse.madduck.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:13:21 +0200
From: martin f krafft <madduck@...duck.net>
To: netdev discussion list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
netconf developers list <netconf-devel@...ts.alioth.debian.org>
Subject: Re: non-root, non-real network manipulation for netconf testing
also sprach Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> [2008.06.03.1247 +0200]:
> I don't believe that's the case for UML.
You're right. I spent some time with UML yesterday and got it to the
point where it can run an command in a UML and report back the
status code without requiring any setup or root rights. If you're
interested:
http://git.debian.org/?p=netconf/netconf.git;a=tree;f=uml;hb=umltest
Now I need to figure out how to set up uml_switch as a user such
that I can have two or three interfaces within the UML on the same
network segment.
Right now, my problem is that if eth0-2 have 1.2.3.1-3 assigned to
them, pinging 1.2.3.2 from 1.2.3.1 will make Linux route the packets
via loopback. I need to figure out how to make them be put on the
wire (which is uml_switch in this case).
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"whale feces or working at microsoft? i would probably be the whale
feces researcher. salt air and whale flatulence; what
could go wrong?"
-- michael moyer, executive editor of _popular science_
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@...duck.net
Download attachment "digital_signature_gpg.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists