[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080605201410.GM20815@postel.suug.ch>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 22:14:10 +0200
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, usagi-core@...linux-ipv6.org,
nakam@...agoma.org, takamiya@...ntts.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6 addrconf: Ignore requests to set NODAD flag when changing addresses
* YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org> 2008-06-05 23:32
> In article <20080605090447.GL20815@...tel.suug.ch> (at Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:04:47 +0200), Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> says:
>
> > * YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org> 2008-06-05 11:53
> > > And well, it does not take effect so far, but
> > > DAD after link failure logic is planned in long term.
> > > So current code is okay to me.
> >
> > Alright, that makes sense if that code ever is written.
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand your new patch though, why do you want to
> > disable setting the nodad flag for new addresses nowW?
>
> If we should really need to avoid the confusion, we have an option
> to disallow modification of NODAD flag so far with the patch I've posted.
> But anyway, I'm going to leave it as-is if you are okay.
Your patch would have disabled the ability to even add new addresses
with the NODAD flag set, that's what confused me. I'm fine with
leaving everything as-is since you explained that DAD will be done
after link failures in the future.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists