[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <484C3C13.7020609@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:07:47 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Jay Cliburn <jacliburn@...lsouth.net>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, w@....eu, pupilla@...mail.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
chrisw@...s-sol.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review
Jay Cliburn wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
>
>> If you ask me in the future about the status of a -stable
>> patch from the networking, I'll let you know exactly what
>> is happening to that patch wrt. stable. I rarely forget
>> to submit an appropriate patch, and when I do forget you
>> merely have to let me know (rather than submitting it
>> to -stable directly, please don't do that) so that I can
>> fit it in with what I plan to submit to -stable already.
>
>
> As a netdev driver maintainer, I've been following this workflow for
> patches that need to go to -stable:
>
> 1. I submit a mainline patch to Jeff Garzik.
> 2. Jeff submits to David.
> 3. David submits to Linus.
> 4. Linus merges patch into mainline.
> 5. I extract mainline commit ID.
> 6. I apply and test patch against appropriate 2.6.x.y git tree.
> 7. I submit patch directly to -stable.
>
> David's admonition tells me I'm doing it wrong, and that I should
> submit the stable patch to Jeff as well. Am I right?
I usually encourage a more-parallel process where you simply email
stable@...nel.org with the upstream commit id of the change(s) in question.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists