netdev - Re: [PATCH] NET: DCB generic netlink interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080610.130726.121879453.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com
Cc:	jeff@...zik.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: DCB generic netlink interface

From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:55:16 -0700

> The 802.1Qbb, per-priority pause (flow control), cannot work in a
> software implementation.

Of course, I know that.

> Also, the Rx filtering can't be emulated in software either.  The
> MAC filters on VLAN priority.  I know that can be configured with
> vconfig and set_ingress_map, but the whole point of the technology
> is to have the Rx processing done in the hardware's packet buffers,
> much like RSS filtering.

This is a scare crow, please don't use arguments like that.

Saying that it can't be done at all in software, but then saying
"well, it sort of can be done, but the point is to do it in hardware"
side-steps the very reason I want you to implement a software variant
of the parts that can be done in software.

> This technology really is a hardware-based technology.

This sounds like another way of saying "having a software
implementation of even some of this facility would compromise
the value of our hardware implementation."

That's not the kind of decision making process we use when
deciding how to implement things in the kernel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html