[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1213264875.29292.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:01:15 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@...x.dk>
To: Martin Devera <devik@....cz>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] HTB scheduler HTB_HYSTERESIS modifications
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 16:28 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Okay, lets wait until I get this kernel into our real-life production
> system. Then I can report on the real-life impact on CPU performance.
I have now tested/deployed the patches on two production servers.
Conclusion is: It should be safe to apply these patches.
See full report here:
http://people.netfilter.org/hawk/patches/htb_nohyst/production_test_results.html
We saw an increased number of interrupts on the test system, when
enabling/disabling htb_hysteresis.
This didn't show up on the production system.
I believe that the increased intr (on test system) is an artifact of the
TCP download got less bursty and more smooth.
I could not measure any increased CPU usage when enabling/disabling
htb_hysteresis.
P.S. As a side note:
Network performance on 2.6.24.4 seems very good! Surprisingly the CPU
usage decreased significanly (see images in full report), when upgrading
to kernel 2.6.25.4 (from 2.6.15). I have not Oprofiled, but from
previous experiences, I believe that its primarily caused by Patrick
McHardys RCU patches to netfilter conntrack, Thanks Patrick!!! :-)
--
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Jesper Brouer
ComX Networks A/S
Linux Network developer
Cand. Scient Datalog / MSc.
Author of http://adsl-optimizer.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
View attachment "production_test_results.txt" of type "text/plain" (2963 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists