[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4845fc0806120631g511c7dbag365a8483134943fd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:31:56 +0200
From: "Julius Volz" <juliusv@...gle.com>
To: "Simon Horman" <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: "Vince Busam" <vbusam@...gle.com>,
"Ben Greear" <greearb@...delatech.com>,
"Patrick McHardy" <kaber@...sh.net>, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/26] IPVS: Add first IPv6 support to IPVS.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> Eventially the changes settled down, and for the past few years they
> have been very infrequent. But the problem that the interface isn't
> really extendable and that when changes are made kernel and ipvsadm
> versions need to be incremented together remains. For instance, the
> Debian package of ipvsadm actually shipps three different ipvsadm
> binaries, and a wrapper works out which one to use based on the kernel
> version.
Ugh.
> I wonder if now would be a good time to bite the bullet and design
> a new interface that is extendable.
If we really have to break it once for IPv6 anyways, it seems like a
good opportunity. Depends on how invasive the changes would need to
be, of course...
You probably already have some ideas on what a better interface would
look like? Especially, how to design it for future backwards
compatibility? And would it still use sockopts or rather one of the
other communication mechanisms?
Julius
--
Google Switzerland GmbH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists