[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080614.001206.153530204.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 08:03:20 +0200
> once i added the patch below this new warning went away. I'm wondering
> what this difference is about and why your revert differs from Ilpo's.
Because I reverted the change we found bugs in.
Ilpo sent you a patch which reverted an entire series of changes
purely so that we could begin to narrow things down.
> It might as well be the right thing to do and the warning just shows
> something latent.
This is my though still currently because I can't see any reason why
the diff you keep posting would cause a device to transmit timeout.
It's likely a timing thing or something weird like that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists