[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080615211030.M80450@visp.net.lb>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:26:48 +0300
From: "Denys Fedoryshchenko" <denys@...p.net.lb>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: romieu@...zoreil.com
Subject: r8169 rx descriptors
>From NetBSD sources
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/sys/dev/ic/rtl8169.c?rev=1.14.2.7&content-type=text/plain&logsort=rev&f=h&only_with_tag=netbsd-3
* o RX and TX DMA rings can have up to 1024 descriptors
* (the 8139C+ allows a maximum of 64)
Why in Linux source:
#define NUM_TX_DESC 64 /* Number of Tx descriptor registers */
#define NUM_RX_DESC 256 /* Number of Rx descriptor registers */
Is it possible to do them changeable over ethtool -g ?
Maybe NetBSD developers signed NDA and have access to datasheets?
Also i seen in one patch from Realtek , something similar to
-#define RX_DMA_BURST 6 /* Maximum PCI burst, '6' is 1024 */
+#define RX_DMA_BURST 7 /* Maximum PCI burst, '6' is 1024 */
Why it is reverted or not applied?
In sources from Realtek website it is
#define RX_DMA_BURST 7 /* Maximum PCI burst, '7' is unlimited */
#define TX_DMA_BURST 7 /* Maximum PCI burst, '7' is unlimited */
I will try to change burst settings on my router, and waiting comments about
--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists