netdev - Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4856D585.5070602@cosmosbay.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:05:09 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Cc:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux.nics@...el.com
Subject: Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?

Denys Fedoryshchenko a e'crit :
> [    0.241017] IP route cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
> [    6.337111] nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (16384 buckets, 65536 max)

Are you sure nf_conntrack or ip route cache is not killing you ?

Filling 512 or 1024 RX ring on Gigabit link can be very fast, especially 
if ip route cache is full.

rtstat -c10 -i1



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html