netdev - Re: [PATCH] [Rev2] MPC5121 FEC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080617195759.GC13147@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:57:59 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	John Rigby <jrigby@...escale.com>
Cc:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	jeff@...zik.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Rev2] MPC5121 FEC support

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 01:43:40PM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Thanks Sam,  Scott already addressed most of your issues.  The 
> background that you are likely missing and I will add to the patch 
> header is that the 5121 has an FEC core with all the same registers as 
> 8xx except the order of the registers is scrambled.  Fortunately the old 
> FEC only exists on CPM1 machines so we can use CONFIG_CPM1 to 
> differentiate between the two.
> 
> 
> >
> >I we have a conversion from fec_t to struct fec
> >then this is a separate patch in the normal case.
> >  
> I'll split the patch into a clean-up patch followed by a 5121 patch.

Thanks John.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html