[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48584CAD.6010509@candelatech.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:45:49 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Travis Stratman <tstratman@...cinc.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: data received but not detected
Travis Stratman wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 15:31 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>> Travis Stratman wrote:
>>> I am working on an application that uses a fairly simple UDP protocol to
>>> send data between two embedded devices. I'm noticing an issue with an
>>> initial test that was written where datagrams are received but not seen
>>> by the recvfrom() call until more data arrives after it. As of right now
>>> the test case does not implement any type of lost packet protection or
>>> other flow control, which is what makes the issue so noticeable.
>> UDP packets can be lost anywhere..including in the receive buffer
>> after it has been received by the NIC.
>>
>> You probably just need to write your code smarter to use non-blocking
>> IO and deal with packet loss.
>
> Thanks Ben.
>
> I understand that there is no guarantee of anything with UDP, but it
> seems to me that if there is a packet in the buffer (it shows up after
> another packet comes in behind it) the system should know about it,
> right?
Ahh, I see what you mean.
I'm afraid I don't know anything about your NIC driver, and it would
seem to be implicated.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists