netdev - Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200806170946.17351.denys@visp.net.lb>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:46:17 +0300
From:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To:	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Cc:	"Eric Dumazet" <dada1@...mosbay.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?

On Tuesday 17 June 2008 02:24, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
First, i catch when tx_deferred_ok increasing, rx_missed_errors also increasing.  For example deffered +1 , missed_errors +10.
A bit strange.

> Try turning off Flow Control using ethtool -A ethX rx off tx off autoneg
> off
Well, seems it is a keypoint on new motherboard, but i have to see at peak time still (about 10-14 hours to go).

So the question is, or flow control is broken here, or it is unknown when i must use flow-control and when - not.

Once i had packetloss on e1000 gigabit link, without it. 
Now it is packetloss - when i start to use it.

-- 
------
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.
Lebanon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html