[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080617.032409.216520881.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 03:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: ralf@...ux-mips.org, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH]: Kill spurious sk->sk_socket NULL assignments in netrom.
Both of these assignments are spurious, so we can delete them.
Applied and pushed out to net-next-2.6
netrom: Kill spurious NULL'ing of sk->sk_socket.
In nr_release(), one code path calls sock_orphan() which
will NULL out sk->sk_socket already.
In the other case, handling states other than NR_STATE_{0,1,2,3},
seems to not be possible other than due to bugs. Even for an
uninitialized nr->state value, that would be zero or NR_STATE_0.
It might be wise to stick a WARN_ON() here.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
net/netrom/af_netrom.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netrom/af_netrom.c b/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
index 5877962..74884f4 100644
--- a/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
+++ b/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
@@ -536,11 +536,9 @@ static int nr_release(struct socket *sock)
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
sock_orphan(sk);
sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DESTROY);
- sk->sk_socket = NULL;
break;
default:
- sk->sk_socket = NULL;
break;
}
--
1.5.5.1.308.g1fbb5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists