[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <485959DC.80902@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:54:20 +0200
From: Anders Grafström <grfstrm@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: David Acker <dacker@...net.com>
CC: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
miltonm@....com, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix e100 on systems that have cache incoherent DMA
>>> David Acker wrote:
>>>> What is the status of this patch?
>>>
>>> Jeff merged it in netdev-2.6#upstream so it is queued for 2.6.25.
The e100 driver broke in 2.6.25 on the ixp4xx based platform I'm using.
This patch seems to be the cause.
It appears to work again with pci_dma_sync_single_for_device() restored.
So I'm wondering if the patch below would be valid and correct?
Anders
diff --git a/drivers/net/e100.c b/drivers/net/e100.c
index f3cba5e..1037b13 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e100.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e100.c
@@ -1803,6 +1803,8 @@ static int e100_rx_alloc_skb(struct nic *nic, struct rx *rx)
if (rx->prev->skb) {
struct rfd *prev_rfd = (struct rfd *)rx->prev->skb->data;
put_unaligned_le32(rx->dma_addr, &prev_rfd->link);
+ pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(nic->pdev, rx->prev->dma_addr,
+ sizeof(struct rfd), PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
}
return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists