[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1213897363.19376.1.camel@lb-tlvb-eliezer>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:42:43 +0300
From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: bhutchings@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mchan@...adcom.com, vladz@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/15]bnx2x: Add TPA, Broadcoms HW LRO
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 16:16 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:17:06 +0100
>
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Eilon Greenstein wrote:
> > > > The TPA stands for Transparent Packet Aggregation. When enabled, the FW
> > > > aggregate in-order TCP packets according to the 4-tuple match and sends
> > > > 1 big packet to the driver. This packet is stored on an SGL in which
> > > > each SGE is 1 page. The FW also implements a timeout algorithm and it
> > > > honors all TCP flag, including the push flag as a trigger to halt
> > > > aggregation.
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > LRO is not compatible with forwarding and will currently trigger a BUG() or
> > > WARN() if used on packets that are then forwarded.
> >
> > Actually, since this implementation doesn't set gso_size in LRO'd skbs, it
> > will confuse TCP in interesting ways instead. You need to set gso_size to
> > the largest segment size seen in the packets that were aggregated.
>
> Eilon, please sort this out, thanks.
Just to make sure that we are working in the right direction: we will
add the ethtool support and the gso_size, but until Ben's patch will be
in place, we will still fail in the same way any other LRO driver will
fail in forwarding.
If this is the case, I will send another patch with the ethtool and
gso_size soon.
Please confirm,
Eilon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists