[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080620.120422.193703152.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: billfink@...dspring.com
Cc: krkumar2@...ibm.com, mchan@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
vinay@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3]: tg3: Manage TX backlog in-driver.
From: Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:52:33 -0400
> I have a general question about this new tx queueing model, which
> I haven't seen discussed to this point.
>
> Although hopefully not frequent events, if the tx queue is kept in
> the driver rather than the network midlayer, what are the ramifications
> of a routing change which requires changing the output to a new interface,
> considering for example that on our 10-GigE interfaces we typically set
> txqueuelen to 10000.
All of the packets would have been in the existing mid-layer generic
backlog anyways, way past the routing decisions. Nothing about
behavior in this area would be changing.
> Similarly, what are the ramifications of such a change to the bonding
> driver (either in a load balancing or active/backup scenario) when one
> of the interfaces fails (again hopefully a rare event).
Since the bonding driver acts like a pass-thru, and because of the
above, I expect no real ramifications in this area as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists