netdev - Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/3] e1000e: set CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9929d2390806231614j66b51d01v103b7dc4efd81b38@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:14:39 -0700
From:	"Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	jeff@...zik.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/3] e1000e: set CONFIG_E1000E=y in x86 defconfigs

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
>>
>> This adds to the already default CONFIG_E1000=y in these files.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  arch/x86/configs/i386_defconfig   |    1 +
>>  arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig |    1 +
>
> that is not an e1000 patch but an arch/x86 defconfig patch. NAK on this
> route of patch propagation.
>

So you are fine with the patch contents, just not the title/subject
line.  So if the subject line was:

[RESEND PATCH 1/3] x86 defconfig: set CONFIG_E1000E=y in x86 defconfigs

Would that have been alright?

-- 
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html