[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080624222807.3a9918d1@speedy>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:28:07 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@...tta.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Cc: NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Patch to add support for multiple multicast routing
tables.
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:50:51 -0700
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> wrote:
> In order to run multiple Xorp instances and treat different groups of
> interfaces as being in their own virtual router, I had to update the
> ipv4/ipmr.c logic to support multiple routing tables.
>
> I will be attempting to push the cooresponding xorp changes to it's
> maintainers if this is accepted into the kernel. It should be fully
> backwards compatible with existing xorp and other multicast
> routing tools. It does change the procfs output slightly, adding
> a TableId column.
>
> The original patch was written by me, and then Patrick McHardy
> fixed up my cruft and made it much smaller and with better locking.
> I then fixed a few bugs I found while testing with my modified xorp.
>
> The attached patch is against 2.6.25.4 + hacks. It has a few rejects
> against 2.6.26.rc7,
> but I will fix those sooner rather than later if the patch is otherwise
> deemed
> worthy.
>
> Please let me know if this stands a chance of inclusion.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
Ben private ioctl's make it hard to handle 32bit/64bit compatiablity,
and routing is better managed through rtnetlink. Doesn't XORP do
netlink?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists