[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080626024927.GC32408@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:49:27 -0400
From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: andy@...yhouse.net, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, bruce.w.allan@...el.com,
john.ronciak@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb: completely disable interrupts during netpoll
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:27:51PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:15:11 -0400
>
> >
> > Globally disable the interrupt during netpoll rather than simply
> > disabling it on the hardware. This will ensure all pending operations
> > are complete and no more will execute. I've seen reports of deadlocks
> > with the current driver and this patch resolves them.
>
> I don't want to see network drivers start getting into the habit
> of doing this. This operation could be extremely expensive with
> certain IRQ controllers.
>
> It's better to have a good understanding of why the deadlocks
> happen, and this was decidedly missing from your commit message.
>
I thought this was a pretty common problem that cannot simply be solved
with a call to synchronize_irq since you might get one that pops on
another CPU and doesn't set the in-progress bit before your
synchronize_irq call completes?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists