netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs_enet: MDIO on GPIO support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080626175523.54728d07@vitb.ru.mvista.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:55:23 +0400
From:	Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@...mvista.com>
To:	Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@...-semaphore.com>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs_enet: MDIO on GPIO support

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:21:23 +0200
Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@...-semaphore.com> wrote:

> > There should be no dependencies. When the OF GPIO support is not selected 
> > linux/of_gpio.h will define of_get_gpio() as a stub, so the fs_enet driver 
> > will fall back to the legacy binding.  
> 
> Have we reached a consensus on which tree the patch should go to ?
I think it should go through powerpc tree, not seeing too much netdev-generic stuff in here.
If noone will object, Kumar will pick it up I guess...

-- 
Sincerely, 
Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html