[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080627191835.GA5064@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:18:35 +0200
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@...l.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edward_hsu@...ltek.com.tw
Subject: Re: How come realtek drivers are combined
Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@...l.com> :
[...]
> Realtek provides several (separated) drivers for their different
> chipsets, r8169, r8168, r8101, etc. I see that they are regularly all
> merged into the r8169 driver in the kernel. How come it works this
> way ?
I made it this way.
> Is it just because no one ever bothered to do it differently ?
It was suggested before but it was not strongly argumented and I have
a strong bias against it as long as it is not clearly needed.
> Obviously, they all share a very similar code base so its somewhat
> sensible to try to produce a single driver.
It was.
I'll probably end splitting things between the old pci-only 8169 and
the newest pci-e though.
> I would think it would work a lot better for everyone if Realtek and
> the kernel maintainers that work on the Realtek driver were directly
> in sync rather than having to play tag pulling patches from each other's
> drivers.
Given that the choice of operating systems for laptops on Dell's online
shop does not include my favorite OS, "everyone" seems a bit of an
overstatement to me (sorry, could not resist :o) ).
Compare two versions of the same driver from Realtek and you should
realize that you are addressing a false problem.
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists