[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <486472F1.4050900@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:56:17 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pl@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] e1000e: fix EEH recovery during reset on PPC
Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> EEH is not recovering in a reasonable amount of time on PPC during
> e1000e_down().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
> index ccb8ca2..0320925 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -2535,7 +2535,8 @@ void e1000e_down(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> adapter->link_speed = 0;
> adapter->link_duplex = 0;
>
> - e1000e_reset(adapter);
> + if (!pci_channel_offline(adapter->pdev))
> + e1000e_reset(adapter);
> e1000_clean_tx_ring(adapter);
> e1000_clean_rx_ring(adapter);
IMO for this type of change, you should consider putting all these
changes into a single patch.
It's exactly the same logical change, so no need to split it up into
three patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists